Skip to content
Photo by Ken Schles via Fridays for Future NYC

Declaring a Climate Emergency to Clear the Way for the Green New Deal

Following the hottest decade on record and unprecedented global temperature increases, climate advocates in 2024 argued that the scale and pace of climate impacts warranted emergency-level federal action. At the time, record-breaking heat, smoke-filled air, and increasingly severe hurricanes underscored warnings from climate scientists and international bodies that average global temperatures had surpassed the 1.5°C threshold, intensifying risks to ecosystems, public health, and economic stability.

During this period, leaders, including the United Nations’ climate chief, emphasized that narrowing timelines for action required dramatic changes in how governments approached climate policy, financing, and fossil fuel dependence. Calls to declare a climate emergency were framed as a mechanism to unlock executive authorities and accelerate the transition away from fossil fuels while scaling investments in climate resilience and clean energy.

The United States emerged during this period as the world’s leading producer of oil and gas, including in production, exports, and infrastructure expansion. Fossil fuel production and combustion were widely identified as the core drivers of the global climate crisis, accounting for the vast majority of human-caused carbon dioxide emissions and more than three-quarters of total greenhouse gas emissions.

During this period, climate advocates argued that redirecting public resources away from fossil fuels and toward renewable energy, transportation, and climate justice was essential to addressing the scale of the crisis. They emphasized that a just energy transition should be grounded in equity, including the Free, Prior, and Informed Consent of Indigenous Peoples, and should seek to repair the climate, racial, socioeconomic, and ecological harms of the fossil fuel era. Advocates outlined a set of policy pathways they believed were necessary to accelerate this transition, including:

  • Declaring climate change a national emergency under existing federal authorities, including the National Emergencies Act, to accelerate the wind-down of the fossil fuel era.
  • Using emergency authorities under the Stafford Act to reimagine the role of the Federal Emergency Management Agency as part of a more just and equitable energy transition.
  • Redirecting federal agency funds toward renewable energy and away from fossil fuels, particularly in communities most impacted by pollution and climate harm.
  • Establishing strong labor standards to protect workers from extreme heat, wildfire smoke, and other climate-related hazards through robust Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulations.

May 2024: 400+ Groups Send Climate Emergency Demands to White House

Why a climate emergency?

During this period, climate advocates argued that a declaration of a climate emergency by President Biden could unlock a range of executive authorities intended to accelerate federal action in response to the climate crisis. Supporters of this approach pointed to several categories of powers they believed could be used to address the scale and urgency of climate impacts. These arguments commonly included:

  • Ending the era of fossil fuels: Advocates proposed phasing out existing fossil fuel production and preventing new fossil fuel projects by limiting crude oil exports, oil and gas drilling, and government subsidies for fossil fuel development.
  • Building renewables at scale: Proponents highlighted the use of presidential authorities, including through the Defense Production Act (DPA), to accelerate a just transition to clean energy, reduce utility costs, create new jobs, and build more resilient and reliable energy systems.
  • Protecting people and planet: Supporters emphasized treating the climate crisis as an emergency in order to prioritize frontline communities and reduce reliance on energy systems shaped by corporate influence and fossil fuel dependence.